data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05db2/05db235383527ee0baf02deaab55d29ad96a3547" alt="Quod libet share itunes"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b12d/2b12ddf8f0481e52cf00e5c2af3488f4d2b9dd00" alt="quod libet share itunes quod libet share itunes"
- #QUOD LIBET SHARE ITUNES INSTALL#
- #QUOD LIBET SHARE ITUNES SOFTWARE#
- #QUOD LIBET SHARE ITUNES SERIES#
Whenever I fill it with music, I first delete the files on it. Further, I use Rhythmbox to put music on my BlackBerry. Whenever I delete a file from my hard drive, it shows up under the ‘Missing Files’ view, even though my intent was clearly to remove the file from my library. Missing Files View: This one is just plain stupid.Way to start the user experience off on the wrong foot. The first thing that I always do is click on the tray icon to maximize it so that I can select some music to start playing. The Player Starts in the Tray: Under what circumstances would it be considered useful for a media player to automatically minimize itself to the system tray on startup? It doesn’t begin to play automatically.Every package manager has the concept of dependencies, so why doesn't Rhythmbox use them?
#QUOD LIBET SHARE ITUNES INSTALL#
They rely on programs like gnome-help and brasero to work, but don’t install them with the media player, so when I try to access these features under KDE, I just get error messages. This extends to the CD burning and help features too. Note that there isn't even an icon for 'Burn' and the icon for 'Browse' is a fucking question mark. Under KDE, the qt re-skinning replaces those icons with a horrible set of mismatched images that really make the program look second-rate:Īs you can see, these icons look terrible. Under GNOME, Rhythmbox has a reasonably nice icon set that is comparable to other media players. Poor Cross-Platform Support: There are basically two desktop environments that matter in the Linux world, GNOME and KDE.This doesn’t affect the overall performance of the app, but leads nicely into my first complaint: A media player is not a hard thing to build, and I do believe that together, we can do better.įor the remainder of this article, please keep in mind that I am currently running Rhythmbox under Kubuntu 9.10, so you’ll see it rendered with qt widgets in all of my screen shots. If you’re a developer for one of these fine projects, try to keep an open mind and get inspired to do better. If you’re a user of media players on Linux, keep your own annoyances firmly in mind, and if I don’t mention them, please share in the comments. Subsequent posts will give the same treatment to other players in this sphere, including Banshee, Amarok, and Songbird (if I can find a copy that will still build on Linux).
#QUOD LIBET SHARE ITUNES SOFTWARE#
This article will concentrate on lambasting Rhythmbox, the default jukebox software of the GNOME desktop environment.
#QUOD LIBET SHARE ITUNES SERIES#
In fact, the very idea behind this series is to shake up the freetards’ world view, and to make them realize that a decent Winamp or iTunes clone need not be the end of the story for media management and playback on Linux. If you’re a platform enthusiast, you may want to cover your ears and scream “la-la-la-la” while reading this article, because it will likely offend your sensibilities. The state of media players on Linux is a sad one indeed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05db2/05db235383527ee0baf02deaab55d29ad96a3547" alt="Quod libet share itunes"